Built for Public Health

Lead through complexity with data you can actually act on.

For health departments, complexity is now the operating environment. Clear Impact connects strategy to execution — pairing Results-Based Accountability with a unified data system that brings your CHA, CHIP, and PHAB accreditation into one place.

Trusted by 300+ health departments and public health agencies nationwide.

Vermont Dept. of Health
Connecticut Dept. of Public Health
San Francisco Dept. of Public Health
Alameda County Public Health
National Institutes of Health

The path forward isn't strategy or execution — it's connecting them: clear results, meaningful measures, consistent review, and the discipline to turn learning into action.

The Reality

Permanent complexity, constant pressure

Workforce strain, rising public expectations, misinformation, climate threats, behavioral health crises, and uneven funding are all shaping the work at once. Three challenges surface again and again.

Capacity is the constraint

Retirements, burnout, and salary competition have left many departments understaffed. Every hour spent wrangling reports is an hour not spent on the mission — so limited capacity has to be used where it matters most.

Fragmented data drains time

Surveillance, program, grant, CHA, CHIP, and PHAB information live in disconnected spreadsheets and tools. Manual aggregation slows situational awareness and buries insight under compliance.

Trust has to be re-earned

In a polarized, misinformation-heavy environment, credibility depends on transparency, consistency, and humility — showing progress openly and explaining the story behind the data.

Workforce strain
The infodemic
Climate-driven threats
Behavioral health & overdose
Funding instability
Data modernization

The answer isn't another initiative. It's a management approach — supported by aligned infrastructure — that connects priorities, measures, review routines, and day-to-day action.

One Unified Data System

Assess, improve, and communicate — in one place

Clear Impact translates Results-Based Accountability from a framework into daily practice — three products that work as one, connecting strategy, measures, action, and reporting.

Collect

Compyle

Community & program data collection

Screenings, assessments, surveys, referrals, case notes, and social-determinant data — collected reliably at the program level, then turned into usable performance information instead of manual spreadsheets.

Measure & Manage

Scorecard

Performance management & accreditation

Organize community health indicators, performance measures, CHIP strategies, narratives, and trendlines in one system — and meet PHAB performance-management requirements as a byproduct of good daily practice.

Communicate

Showcase

Public-facing transparency

Embed interactive, accessible dashboards on your own website so residents, boards, and policymakers can see progress in real time — the way Vermont and Utah publish their scorecards openly.

Compyle collects the data · Scorecard turns it into managed performance · Showcase communicates it — one unified data system, framed by Results-Based Accountability.

The Framework

Two kinds of accountability — kept clear

RBA gives public health leaders a disciplined structure for defining results and clarifying what a department can influence versus what it directly delivers — the distinction at the heart of every challenge above.

Population Accountability

The whole community

"Are conditions of well-being improving?"

Community health conditions — chronic disease, maternal and infant health, behavioral health, safety — that no single agency controls and that require collaboration across sectors.

Performance Accountability

A program or agency

"Is the program working — is anyone better off?"

The department's measurable contribution: treatment referrals, screening participation, naloxone distribution, outreach engagement. Focus limited capacity where you have the greatest influence.

Every program answers three questions

1

How much did we do?

2

How well did we do it?

3

Is anyone better off?

"Turn the Curve" — from a trend to action

Reporting a measure is the start, not the end. Teams read the trend, tell the story behind it, and decide what to do next — then repeat.

1 Review the trend
2 The story behind the curve
3 Identify the partners
4 What works
5 Take action
300+
Health departments & public agencies served
468K+
Social impact measures in use across the field
48/12
Indicators across focus areas — Healthy Vermonters 2030
25+
Years measuring what matters in the public sector
What to Measure

Prioritize the measures that earn their place

A strong system doesn't track every possible data point. It selects a manageable set of measures that protect capacity and support accountability, learning, decisions, and public communication.

1

Community health conditions & indicators

The conditions of well-being you want to improve — chronic disease, maternal and infant health, behavioral health, life expectancy.

2

Program reach

How many residents, families, or priority populations received services, screenings, or support.

3

Service quality

How well services were delivered — timeliness, completion, follow-through, cultural responsiveness, access.

4

Population & participant outcomes

Whether people are healthier — vaccination and screening uptake, managed conditions, reduced risk behaviors.

5

Health equity & disaggregation

Whether outcomes differ by race, ethnicity, income, geography, language, or disability — so disparities are visible.

6

Emerging & environmental risks

Heat-related illness, air-quality exposure, disaster injuries, and overdose measures like naloxone distribution.

7

System, partner & resource alignment

Coalition participation, data sharing, and how funding and staff align to CHIP priorities.

The guiding principle

Every measure should have a clear purpose — inform strategy, demonstrate accountability, support improvement, or reveal disparities.

From the Field

What high-performing public health looks like

Departments make stronger progress when they pair a clear improvement method with infrastructure and routines they can sustain.

Featured · Vermont Department of Health

Healthy Vermonters 2030

Vermont uses Clear Impact Scorecard to track statewide data and communicate progress toward its Healthy Vermonters 2030 initiative — engaging policymakers, agencies, professionals, and the public in setting, measuring, and working toward long-term public health outcomes, with scorecards published openly for transparency and accountability.

48Indicators tracked
12Focus areas
PublicTransparency
12 Focus Areas
Children & YouthPregnant People & InfantsOlder AdultsMortalityEnvironmentInjury & ViolenceChronic DiseaseHealthy Behaviors & PreventionHealthcareSubstance Use & TobaccoMental Health & ResiliencySocial Determinants

Protect capacity with clarity

When staffing is stretched, a manageable set of indicators keeps effort focused and morale intact — separating population-level outcomes from the department's direct contribution.

In practice: Healthy North Carolina 2030 and its State Health Improvement Plan prioritized a focused set of measures the department could actually manage.

Rebuild trust with transparency

Credibility grows when institutions report progress openly, acknowledge uncertainty, and explain the story behind the trend — not just the number.

In practice: Vermont and Utah publish their scorecards on public websites so residents and policymakers can follow progress directly.

Strengthen your contribution to the curve

On overdose, behavioral health, and climate risk, no single agency controls the outcome — so leaders track measurable contributions and coordinate with partners.

In practice: Treatment referrals, outreach engagement, and naloxone distribution show real impact without over-claiming control.
"You cannot control the entire curve, but you can strengthen your contribution to it."
Public Health at a Crossroads · Clear Impact
Transparency

Transparency is core public health leadership

Transparency isn't just a communication tactic — it's how modern health departments earn trust. Sharing appropriate, meaningful data helps stakeholders understand how decisions are made and how progress is measured.

  • Residents & community can see what's improving and where continued attention is needed.
  • Policymakers & funders gain confidence that investment connects to measurable outcomes — supporting advocacy for resources.
  • Partners & providers understand how their work contributes to shared community health goals.
  • Your own team spends less time reconciling reports and more time interpreting trends and acting.
The health department as the hub
Providers Schools Social Svcs Emergency Mgmt Community Health Dept.

Partners keep their own systems, but shared measures and one data environment let the department see — and share — the whole picture.

Getting Started

From framework to function

A staged path that maps to the work you already do — assessment, improvement planning, accreditation, and continuous review — adapted to your capacity and timeline.

Phase 1

Identify & Train

Build the team's skills across RBA, Scorecard, Compyle, and Showcase.

Phase 2 · Assess

Community Health Assessment

Analyze community health data to identify priority problems and assets.

Phase 3 · Design

Improvement Plan

Select indicators and performance measures; separate population from program measures.

Phase 4

Configure

Build Scorecards, Compyle forms, and dashboards; align CHA, CHIP, and PHAB in one system.

Phase 5

Engage Partners

Bring coalitions, providers, and sister agencies into shared measures and reporting.

Phase 6

Pilot

Start with one focus area; refine usability and measures before expanding.

Phase 7

Scale & Publish

Expand across CHIP priorities and publish public dashboards for the community.

Phase 8

Review

Hold regular Turn the Curve reviews; update your CHA/CHIP and report with credibility.

Clear Impact Is Ready to Help

Turn complexity into measurable progress

Whether you're strengthening strategic planning, improving review routines, building staff capacity, or reducing the burden of fragmented reporting — we provide a practical path forward.